The
Parasha –portion of Ba'alotcha , Numbers 9:1, notes that a year after the
Exodus, in the month of Nissan God commanded Israel to bring the Pesach
Offering at its appointed time – the 14th of Nissan. There were people who could
not bring the Pesach Offering because they were impure and the solution given
was that they could bring the offering a month later on Pesach Sheini. This
passage seems out of place and really should be written at the beginning of the
Book of Numbers- Bamidbar. The Book of Numbers- Bamidbar however starts a month
later- Iyar- when the children of Israel were counted and given flags. The
question asked is why didn't the book of Bamidbar- Numbers begin with the
earlier event, and relate the mitzvah to bring the Pesach offering in the
desert. During their 40 year stay in the wilderness, the Israelites brought the
Pesach offerings only in the first year. Recording the commandment to bring the Pesach offering as the opening of the Book of
Numbers would highlight this failure and be a black mark against the children
of Israel. The reason why they could not bring the Pesach offering was that all
male children needed to be circumcised. Because of the journey and the climate, it was dangerous to do a Bris Mila = circumcision. If circumstance prevented
them from circumcising the boys and then bringing the Korban Pesach, why should
not bringing the offering be a black mark against them? Don't we say – ' o'nes
rach'mana pa'tra –that God is forgiving and exempts if one cannot comply with
his commandments because of circumstances beyond one's control ,duress etc? The
question is rather - what got them into the situation that made them exempt from
bringing the Pesach offering? If not for the sins of the Spies, God would not
have detained them in the desert. It was because of their sins that they could
not circumcise their children and then bring the Pesach Offering.
I would like to suggest another
answer. We see that the tribe of Levi circumcised their children despite the
danger. So only the tribe of Levi offered the Pesach Offering during the 40
years in the desert. Their perception of the situation was different and they
did not see the situation as preventing them from circumcising their children and
then bringing the Pesach Offering. They chose not to use the ' perfect excuse '
to exempt themselves from fulfilling God's commandments. The black mark against
the rest of the Israelites is that they chose to make use of the perfect
excuse of ' o'nes rach'mana pa'tra –that God is forgiving
and exempts if one cannot comply with his commandments because of duress etc .
An insight about the differences between members of
communities will share some light on this difference between the tribe of Levi
and the rest of the children of Israel. There
are those people who are always are present at and come on time to 'shiurim' =
lessons, 'minyan' = prayer sessions or social events. There are those who often
fail to attend the lessons, prayer sessions and yet ,they have the perfect
excuses - אונס רחמנא פטרא - God absolves those people
because of the circumstances or situation they find themselves. What is
interesting it is the same people who never miss a shi'ur = lesson or 'minyan'
= prayer meeting and it the same people who always miss here and there ,and
always have the perfect excuses, so it is impossible to find fault with
them.
The difference is that the people
who always attend, choose not to take advantage of the ' perfect excuse and
their attendance is guaranteed by a commitment, resolve, passion and love for
what they do .In response God creates opportunities and an environment which
supports their passion and commitment. Those people who choose to take
advantage of excuses are provided even more excuses not to attend the minyan or
shiurim.
Another difference is that when
on the rare occasion these people can't attend they respond like the people in
our parasha =portion who could not bring the Pesach sacrifice at the right time
because they were impure. They asked Moshe's help and even made a suggestion
that a Kohen-priest would bring the sacrifice and sprinkle the blood on their
behalf. These people try to find ways so that they can make up for lost
opportunities. Those who have the perfect excuses don't have any regrets and
are actually happy to be free of any obligation.
The question still remains
how the 'tribe of Levi' could circumcise their children when it put their
children's lives in danger. They would have to rely on God's intervention and
support in the form of a miracle. Just as Leah asked for a miracle, the tribe
of Levi felt they could rely on God's help and be confident about the safety
and health of their newly circumcised babies. Leah realized that she was about
to have another son and that would mean that Rachel would only contribute one
son to the 12 tribes, not even equal to one of her handmaids. In order to spare
Rachel the humiliation she asked that her unborn son would become a
daughter. The Talmud however says that we cannot pray to change an existing
reality like the sex of a fetus so how could Leah ask for this? The Talmud answers that people who lived and
operated on a different level and sphere, pushing their limits to be above nature
could ask for miracles. The natural laws that governed their lives were
different from other people. So too, the natural laws applying to the tribe of
Levi were different because of the way they chose to live their lives
.If we want our kids and students to be at every shi'ur and minyan we
need to ' model ' this type of commitment. We need to help them find meaning,
purpose and passion in what they do, to become competent and also
feel a sense of support, belonging and community. In this way they will become
like the tribe of Levi who never had to make use of the perfect excuse – o'nes
rachmana patra...
No comments:
Post a Comment